tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7139389588239645042.post9081495050307861621..comments2020-10-08T20:41:48.554-07:00Comments on Theresa Duncan Central: Theory: Why Theresa didn't want her blog to be too interactivePoulethttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13500497022202156550noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7139389588239645042.post-3571281127856087122007-08-24T11:39:00.000-07:002007-08-24T11:39:00.000-07:00I did know, thanks. I believe that was all straig...I did know, thanks. I believe that was all straightened out.<BR/><BR/>And one thing had nothing to do with the other.Whodoohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12120455407514922099noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7139389588239645042.post-58665946987070347872007-08-24T10:19:00.000-07:002007-08-24T10:19:00.000-07:00Full Tilt--Did you know that someone was posing as...Full Tilt--Did you know that someone was posing as you on a perfume forum? Was this connected in some way?<BR/><BR/>http://pherolibrary.com/forum/showthread.php?t=16122Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12775822176260133866noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7139389588239645042.post-24949690377813628742007-08-24T06:06:00.000-07:002007-08-24T06:06:00.000-07:00I'm fulltiltredhead. I sent TD an email saying I ...I'm fulltiltredhead. <BR/><BR/>I sent TD an email saying I enjoyed her blog, maybe a year or so ago, and she responded. We had bits of conversation here and there after that, via email. I remember we talked about the print ad for Coomb's (sp?) fragrance, "Unforgiven." (We disagreed, but it was a good discussion that I think we both enjoyed.) Besides that, just random comments and observations, nothing personal.<BR/><BR/>I'm not sure it was that she didn't want fans posting, because she posted someone's comment that she was pretty. But I posted a few times to take issue with a point of view she'd expressed or represented, and my posts were censored out. She didn't like to be challenged in public. So rather than respond on her blog, I would email her, so the conversation would be private. She seemed to prefer that; she responded, anyway.<BR/><BR/>Except for the time that she and I were discussing her take on the boomers, and I busted her out. I had an intuition she was lying about her age, and, being born Dec. 1956, I was tired of her anti-boomer rants, which hurt my feelings. She responded to my email via reply email, and I wrote back again, arguing her response. <BR/><BR/>Next thing I know, she had published my private email to her on her blog, with a picture of someone flipping the bird, and her response email to me, slightly edited. <BR/><BR/>She never asked my permission to publish our private correspondence on her blog. She didn't give me an opportunity to edit what I'd written, while she took the opportunity to edit her reply email to me before she published it. She did not post my response to her reply, instead giving herself the last word. I emailed her I thought all of that was dirty pool. The next day, she sent me an invitation to some party in New York. I ignored it and deleted our correspondence.Whodoohttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12120455407514922099noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7139389588239645042.post-40081958312932149822007-08-24T04:24:00.000-07:002007-08-24T04:24:00.000-07:00I noticed that she'd posted at least one picture o...I noticed that she'd posted at least one picture of the facehunter - at that time a blog with a following of fashionistas - and pretended it was taken at a gathering of her faux lunar society. I thought it was an odd practice to not at least somewhere credit the facehunter (and to be fooling her visitors),which I did let her know. She didn't post my comment nor did she respond privately.Louhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07559427029026119650noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7139389588239645042.post-39449390738554022142007-08-24T04:22:00.000-07:002007-08-24T04:22:00.000-07:00This comment has been removed by the author.Louhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07559427029026119650noreply@blogger.com